Nietzsche often gleefully pointed out how the religion of universal love was paranoid about sin, fixating with almost erotic satisfaction on the suffering of those in hell. Nietzsche thought that unawareness of often unconscious motivators leads us to make vulgar and baseless moral claims. Invocations of resentment can also be dangerously overused to dismiss appeals which are really about fairness or justice. Nonetheless, it was a profound contribution to our understanding of morality.
It certainly is not mere consumerism and the acquisition of material goods. He draws our attention to the many ways in which external factors like culture and internal psychological motivations like resentment can actually lead us to become false or vulgar iterations of our selves.
The task then is to free ourselves from these inauthentic constraints through continuous and arduous self-overcoming. And of our fundamental needs to obey — and command. Because we misperceive the world — via anthropological and linguistic errors — we also fail to see its essence — the sovereignty of the will to power. And that is his fundamental value for me…. The difference between Kierkegaard and Nietzsche is that one was a Christian philosopher and the other was not.
The Christian myth being the first casualty. It is worth bearing in mind that, without Nietzsche, there would be no Freud and no Jung; these are the founders of modern psychoanalysis. He is regarded as as influential as Darwin and Einstein. Youtube lectures on Nietzsche are the best way to learn about his subtle and elusive message. Men with the strongest immune system do not become ill. But they do, eventually. Well, death is certainly not an invigoration; whatever you call it — and however you parse the causality — strength has never been permanent for any individual organic entity or by extension, culture..
And Nietzsche too would explain — basically has explained — the decline of stronger civilizations on the basis 1 of decadence internal exhaustion; e. This strongly hints to the fact that if you just read about his views instead of reading his work directly, you are very likely to miss out on a lot. Alas, he was a very poor example of his own philosophy. If you want to be believed, prove your speech by your acts. Mussolini was maybe a bastard but he could read. Ecce Homo is indeed an excellent illustration of a proto-nazi book. His only excuse was, perhaps, he was already mad.
I have a visceral hate for Nietzsche. He is a stupid, incoherent, arrogant, and inegalitarian philosopher, whose status in the philosophical community is totally undeserved. His vagueness and inconsistency are presented as positive qualities, and the reader who does not understand him is told to read X more books about how to correctly interpret Nietzsche. Second, Nietzsche was an elitist and celebrates inequality. The thing to understand here is that the kind of hierarchy he desires is 1 a meritocratic one, a hierarchy between individuals rather than groups and 2 a hierarchy based around brute biological and psychological capabilities such as intelligence, strength, determination, etc… as opposed to group-level hierarchies based on race, sex, wealth, or other social group marker.
This allows the Left to also claim N as one of their own. What characterizes the Left as a whole, notwithstanding their internal disagreements, is seeing society as conflict between oppressed groups and oppressive groups or institutions. However, the Left is relatively uninterested by individual inequalities and sometimes promote views and policies that would make them worse eg. Oh, really? The only 2 direct critics of N I found as opposed to people who just disagree on the correct interpretation were Bertrand Russell, who is quoted here, and Steven Pinker.
They are the ones making the values now. People like McManus think he should rule or be making the rules and norms. And if you disagree with this state of affairs? Well, read the article he wrote. Nietzsche is popular because his work is academic self-fellatio. Is the author a leftist though?
Quillette is crawling with leftists who just got kicked by their former leftist friends. The attacks on the Left here are by the not-quite-so-Left Left. You sound like a cuck pleb. Your lord and savior Friedrich Nietzsche presides over you on the vista of world historical significance. The truth is, there has been no thinker as universally significant as Nietzsche since his time. He is up there with Marx and Darwin in terms of effect on the world, and probably more profound than either of them because he was a prophet of the upcoming century and also spawned psychoanalysis.
Jim and Them
The 20th and 21st centuries could be aptly called the Nietzschean era. That is his impact you plebtard. No other thinker foresaw the consequences of the death of god like he did. What an utter stupidity. Also, in the postwar Anglosphere, Nietzsche absolutely had a bad reception until he was rehabilitated by Kaufmann.
The Project Gutenberg eBook of Urania, by Camille Flammarion.
Learn your history. I thank you for this honesty as it essentially explains the rest of your comment. Odd that you would admit to not having read or understood him but then proceed to lecture us on how to correctly interpret him. For myself I find something of value in almost every paragraph I read of Nietzsche. He is, in my opinion, one of the most literal philosophers in the Western canon.
Think Globally, Shame Constantly: The Rise of Greta Thunberg Environmentalism
We all do. Do you seek out mediocre music? Do you celebrate the achievements of the average athlete? Whatever your passion is I guarantee you that you, like the rest of us, seek out the best representatives of it to admire and emulate. Nietzsche in this regard is imploring us to be honest: the real reason we despise hierarchy is more likely from envy and resentment of those at the top than out of any real attachment to principles of equality.
- RUBIES, WINE, AND BRASS DOORKNOBS: Tuckaseegee Chronicles 16 (The Tuckaseegee Chronicles).
- The Accidental Vegan.
- The 'stuff' of the universe keeps changing!
- Come Undone (The Cityscape Series Book 1).
- Smelling the Sky;
It would be a good thing if they stood by their principle in this case. I can only disagree. If you can point me to thinkers who tackled these ideas prior to and in greater depth than Nietzsche I would sincerely be grateful. The question is what effect it has on the individual or group who is resentful. Does it make them a better person? Does it help them overcome whatever is holding them back?
I would argue that resentment is wrong precisely because, by focusing on the other rather than oneself, it offers cheap emotional compensation in place of any real growth. I find scientific explanations of the origins of guilt and bad conscience much more convincing than his. N freely mixes value judgments with facts. I posted one in the same vein below. Yet, Nietzsche has impacted you, no? And Nietzsche was right about Egalitarianism, it IS a fiction based on resentment and a denial of human nature.
Of all of the major Western Philosophers on the topics of morality and human behavior, Nietzsche is easily the most accurate and honest of the bunch. Nietzsche examined things from many sides, often leading to apparently contradictory pronouncements. Explaining Nietzsche is beside the point.
Josh Woodward's MP3 Music Collection - All Songs
Read Nietzsche yourself and leave out the intermediaries who reduce everything to gruel. The article fixed Nietzsche well in his own corner; the trouble is, Nietzsche himself exhorted us to look around it…. Nietzsche certainly was a radical individualist but, I believe much more than that.
- Confessions of a self-professed Casanova..
- Flight cancellations and their influence on people’s behaviours: A guideline for observing stranded people?
- 40 Day Sales Dare for New Homes Sales.
As the author correctly points out, it is difficult to categorize Nietzsche partly because of the very nature of his writings. He writes somewhat in fragments and taken individually one fragment may say one thing which is contradicted by another fragment somewhere else. Making sense of all of this is, I believe, a key to understanding Nietzsche. I believe Nietzsche understands himself as a force of nature. His writings are a manifestation of him contemplating and transforming experiential reality into language he also wrote music.
He is not concerned with generating a systematic philosophy. He is not concerned with contradictions because he understands reality itself to consist of a vast unified play of contraries. Nietzsche, in effect, provokes the reader to get beyond all preconceptions of how reality works and to actually pay attention to the contradictory and even frightening nature of experiential reality.
Related The Loser, the Psycho, and the Retard (Same Planet - Different World Book 2)
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved